Sunshine wrote:Oh wow, for someone who has repeatedly said how much you don't care you just can't help yourself.
And I gotta love your deliberate misrepresentation. Given that body image line of mine was about the *original* drawing of Acey. You know the one that's not actually fat. You know the one that had its url quoted in your post.
You wrote:I redid her hair. And I expanded out her figure and made her a bit shorter.
Wow.
That is fitting given you try to make a grand ending on... "Those vacant doll eyes you gave this one at least are accurate" Yeah, those vacant eyes... that I didn't draw.
Sunshine wrote:Those pictures? So... a deliberate use of plural. Erm, the only other Nanny picture there is Acey's original.
http://sunny-temple.deviantart.com/art/ ... -491981663
And if you think that figure is plump, let alone fat, then I don't know what to say about your views on body image.
I mean I can understand you saying that about the one I modified, sure. But the other one? Okay...
Doesn't seem like you ever get anything. You never have anything to really say, so you try to nitpick and get hyper focused on some little thing to get upset about. It's not exactly impressive text slight of hand. Perhaps you'd like to argue over the meaning of the word 'the'.Sunshine wrote:Yeah, your magnanimous "help". Amazing. And yes I'm well aware of your intent.
It's pretty clear which image I was talking about... given the whole url... and that I readily copped to the modified image.
And so... in an attempt to salvage your snark you of imply that I should have taken the eyes that Acey originally drew them and... not made them vacant doll eyes? Yeah, that'll show me!
Sunshine wrote:Pointing out that you were talking about the wrong picture... is nitpicking. Or telling you that the very eyes you criticized me for drawing... I didn't draw is nitpicking (and look you're now happy I didn't draw them. )
And now you're going on about all the times you've extended the olive branch? (And you're pushing the lie that won't listen to anyone else. Right, because it's not like Strained Harmony ch3 was spit into two and a half chapters because I didn't care.) But no the big bad Sunny won't take *your* counsel.
Now coupled with your ready admission that you're only to "warn" others about me (I guess my "fetishes" are some big secret that need exposing).... well that makes your comment about my "inner circle" raise an eyebrow.
Okay, even if I am the unreasonable one, why do you *care*?
I haven't made demands on any of your stories, or written angry reviews of your work, or mocked your writing,
or written to you demanding back-stories of your characters to use in parodies. This is all hilariously one-sided.
Why do I care? What kind of stupid question is that? I've told you before that I do like your stories. Seeing them implode and become generically focused on such well defined things at the cost of the story is upsetting.
I would love it if you did, cause at least you'd finally be admitting that you do look at my work.
purposely made Ranma gain a large amount of weight at an unhealthy rate due to poor eating habits.
The only word that fits -- Rubensesque.
purposely made Ranma gain a large amount of weight at an unhealthy rate due to poor eating habits.
The only word that fits -- Rubensesque.
Cheb wrote:So what? They are super-powered anyway. See this guy? His power level is over 1000, greater even than Kami sama's whom he serves.
Sunshine wrote:These two lines make for a... disquieting mix:
You honestly feel so slighted at the decay in my work that you've kept shouting at me over several years, all while knowing that I wouldn't listen to you. And at the same time you became convinced that I was secretly reading your stories and never admitting to it. Now that's a heady brew you've got going.
(The most I do is check every post in C&C to make sure it's on topic. And that just takes confirming a post is prose, commentary, or response to commentary. So no, I haven't read any of your works.)
Again more and more I am struck by how one sided this is. And you've certainly shown that it was totally groundless for me to not want to give you story data.
Apologies to everyone else for drawing this out. I indulged and really should have ignored this or taken the responses to private message.
That's a nice little straw man, I said regularly posted. I can go look on the list and see the icon indicating I got a post in that thread for the majority of them.Sunshine wrote:Law... you're shocked that a forum admin takes a couple seconds to make sure posts are on topic in the one part of the forum where that matters the most... or are you insulted by the lack of trust? (And it hasn't been years where you've been the only one posting, and even though you post the majority in recent months it hasn't been just you. A glance at the C&C list would show *that*).
And Law if I did find something I'd forward it to another admin to see if they thought it was a violation and if so they would handle it. (Someone abstaining from using power because they feel they might have a personal influence on it? Shocking!)
Do you think I'm playing a gotcha game with Cheb because I check every one of his posts on C&C too?
Just look at this. Yes, *I'm* the one that's obsessed. *I'm* the one that *must* be reading your stories in secret and copying scenes and ideas from them (Wow, is *THAT* why you're so angry? You've invented this conspiracy where I dare to read your stories in secret, copy the ideas, then write something up and then *DARE* not to take your glorious advice? That's nuts). I'm the one that's being a dismissive prick (not you' you're a pure as driven snow). You're really insistent on thinking that this is a two-way street aren't you?
And what is your goal here? You're not making me want to tell you anything story-wise or take any of your advice.
Everyone else, I don't know what to say. This is getting almost conspiratorial on Law's part.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users