Is that the missile defense that supposedly has a good chance of shooting fast-moving objects out of the sky?
Sort of. Their first big time in the spotlight during 2nd Gulf War(-91), well later analysis showed that they probably didn't manage to actually shoot down even a single Scud, but obviously they've been improved a lot since then, though current opinions range all the way from "works every time" to "still can't hit the broadside of a barn, from the inside" so it's kinda hard to evaluate how much its been improved, still, it should at least have a
chance at doing it by now. Maybe even a good chance. Something more serious about it failing should have leaked by now if it was still craptacular.
Problem is that it's extremely hard to intercept something incoming ballistically. There's good reason why the Soviets set up their missile defense around Moscow on the basis of "put enough metal in the air and something is bound to hit", just pure overkill, because finessing it just didn't work, and might still not work very well.
The reason being simply that a ballistic missile comes down at extreme speed, which makes common ways that interception works, just doesn't work, as well as hugely reducing margins of error, for example, the ballistic missile moves much faster than the shrapnel from an interception missile does.