Crescent Pulsar S wrote:Looking at the world through numbers is scary. O_O
In Pensées, Pascal wrote:"The eternal silence of these infinite spaces frightens me"
It could be worse -- I could introduce infinities.
but in my case Latin was replaced by Fortran.
I'm not sure what languages coders are using today, because that keeps changing.
Latin isn't quite as dead as one might think.
Spica75 wrote:Well, REAL latin is long dead, while the official, stilted book-latin, frozen in time, still lives by means of medical assistance.
Still, latin is part of many languages to some extent or another so of course it´s still useful.
Ellen Kuhfeld wrote:Church Latin may also count, though strange things can happen to it when it is spoken by people of varying native language...
Spica75 wrote:... most recently C# seems to be the most, used. ...
Té Rowan wrote:Perhaps I'm being slightly unkind, but as far as I can tell, C# is pretty much C++ running on Microsoft's .NET abstraction layer.
This is another great advantage of Latin: it holds still. If you learned Latin long ago, it's still the same Latin today. Fortran cannot make that claim.
, C# is pretty much C++ running on Microsoft's .NET abstraction layer.
Wirth-style languages just feel more accessible to me.
Python
Cheb wrote:On the other hand, if you learn one programming language, learning an another one is easy. After that... It's mostly meh, peace of cake. Learning to work with specific libraries takes more effort that learning a programming language.
Spokavriel wrote: I think this requires metaphysics. And you all have gone far off the topic.
On the other hand, if you learn one programming language, learning an another one is easy.
After that... It's mostly meh, peace of cake. Learning to work with specific libraries takes more effort that learning a programming language.
but it wins by being utterly ubiquitous, like roaches)
Users browsing this forum: No registered users