There's a lot of guessing going on in this this thread, so I did a little research using Japanese Google and the some Japanese abstracts on family law.
Children in Japan are required by law to be registered in the 戸籍謄本 (koseki tohon or family register) at birth. Not registering children would be considered a crime. Of course, as noted above, there are children who may not be registered. They would then become wards of the state if no adult were able to claim or prove parentage or guardianship.
If a child is abandoned (perhaps a more technical term for being 'disowned') and is not entered on a family register, s/he is ineligible for Japanese citizenship, cannot enter the national health insurance system and cannot married. In certain cases it is possible to create one's own koseki, which solves this problem.
Some prefectures, such as Kumamoto, have introduced a 'baby hatch' system to deal with unwanted children (akachan posuto). Parents or guardians are found for these children; adoptees enter the foster parents' koseki. Children in orphanages typically were registered in their parents' koseki at birth.
However, it is a crime to refrain from register the birth of a child. And it is pretty uncommon to 'disown' or abandon a child to boot (the children in the movie 'Nobody Knows' were registered on the mother's koseki tohon). It is also extremely difficult to remove one's child from one's family register or 'disown them.' One cannot just go down to the local city or ward office and do this sort of thing.
I don't think abandonment is an "Asian" thing, as the same problem can exist in Canada, the US or Europe.
Still, it must be said that Japan has long had the practice of 'water babies,' unwanted children drowned at birth by farming families with too many mouths to feed.
I would point out that the Ranma-verse is still stuck in the 1980's and, with 30 years between that and now, customs and laws have changed.Crescent Pulsar S wrote:Ah, thanks, that helps. It makes a lot of the examples I've seen in fan-fiction (especially with Ranma) unrealistic, though. I should probably go for the adoption and name change route, then.
Konsaki wrote:I would point out that the Ranma-verse is still stuck in the 1980's and, with 30 years between that and now, customs and laws have changed.
Even with that, I would hazard a guess that, back then, all they would do was remove them from the family register that the family held onto, not the government's version, to hammer in the 'You are dead to me/I have no son' mentality. As stated in the last bit of the post I put up, there are people being disowned all over the world still today and that's the version I'd see Ranma suffering from if Nodoka didn't go through with the Seppuku contract.
I stand corrected. Still quite a while to have things change.Actually in Chapter 333: アロハ漂流教室 (Aroha hyoryu kyoshitsu) in the manga Ranma finds a journal dated 1990 so we know that the events in the manga MUST take place after that year. This fits with the majority of the manga being written in the 1990s (1988-1996). So Ranma is at worst 23 years in the past and likely more recent.
Konsaki wrote:I would point out that the Ranma-verse is still stuck in the 1980's and, with 30 years between that and now, customs and laws have changed.
Even with that, I would hazard a guess that, back then, all they would do was remove them from the family register that the family held onto, not the government's version, to hammer in the 'You are dead to me/I have no son' mentality.
As stated in the last bit of the post I put up, there are people being disowned all over the world still today and that's the version I'd see Ranma suffering from if Nodoka didn't go through with the Seppuku contract.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users