XofderXofder wrote:Clarke's Law: Any sufficiently advanced or different technology is indistinguishable from magic
Niven's Law: Any sufficiently rigorously defined magic is indistinguishable from technology.
Spica75 wrote:Both claims are false.
I'd just like to add my two cents. (Just that much 'cause I'm poor, obviously.) Mostly to clarify the last several posts rather than argue. That's the intent I'm going for, anyway.
First, within the context of this story idea, I'd like to think that magic is material, not conceptual. (I think it's important to separate these two types of magic.) As a concept (wherein magic is used to label something as being unexplainable and/or fantastical), Clarke's Law isn't false. However, technology would require the magic to be material, and in that way Clarke's Law is false. As either material or concept, Niven's Law (as written, which I think is incorrect because it should be the direct opposite of Clarke's Law) would be false, because definition is handled by the methodology of science. (It would be akin to putting together the kingdom, class, family, genus, et cetera of a given creature, the result of which not being a technology.) If there's a science to magic, then technology can be fashioned out of it. If there isn't, good luck casting spells or using it for anything with any reliable results.
Spica mentioned that lifting something with one's will couldn't be seen as technology, and I would agree. If the effect has a natural (in this case, biological) source, it can't be technology. Technology requires at least one more step before its function can be the result of itself, and someone to produce it outside of natural processes (if we assume (as most do) that the actions of mankind aren't natural, or -- in other words -- an exception to the natural order of things). It's the difference between finding something that can be used as a straw as it is, and finding something that requires some modifications before it can function like one (which might also require the use of technology).