Howdy!
I few comments on the comments I have so far:
Light02 wrote:damn the angst is getting thicker but still good Tri-Ojisan.
Kadunta wrote:Angst is good. Angst is tasty. Angst is the spice what makes the few moments of joy and bliss (there will be some of them coming up later on, right?) feel ever sweeter.
ranger5 wrote:I agree, awfully angsty ... but given the situation much more reasonable that Ranma suddenly thinking that everything is okay and life is all good with nothing bad to worry about.
Good chapter. I do hope it lightens up soon though (g). Ranma's been through so much.
Thanks. This is a low spot in Ranma's life and this is probably as dark as the story will get, I'll be lightening up from here on out.
Climhazard wrote:That may be strange and freaky, but i can understand Genma... And even agree with him on some level...
I did want to flesh out Genma in this and wanted to show more what motivated him. I wanted to avoid the "Genma is an idiot" thingie. I'm going to shoot for semi-sympathic for Genma.
Alathon wrote:Enjoyed reading it in general, but one thing I don't understand.. wouldn't Akane and Kasumi have married into their husbands families, and hence wouldn't their children be members of those families and not Tendos?
I did bring that up in the chapter and Genma dismissed that fact as "Anything Goes is a duty that transcends family names" or such.
nuclear death frog wrote:It never was, and Genma should know this. Actually, Ranma hardly ever used that move, because its utility is rather limited -- in fact, in two of Ranma's biggest victories, it would have been virtually useless. And in one other, it would have been counterproductive.
Having Genma call it that smacks of Idiot Plot Device.
Okay, can you narrow this down for me? I know Ranma had developed the move to counter Ryoga's Shi Shi Hokodan and he had used it I think once after that. I chose that particular one because it is emotion driven and uses contrasting emotions that the Shi Shi Hokodan uses. Can you suggest a tweak?
What the hell is "Idiot Plot Device" mean? I couldn't find any reference on Wikipedia or any clear definitions in the short amount of time I had to look for one. I couldn't find any reference to it in the index or glossary of "Simon and Schuster handbook for Writers" either or any of the few 'writing' web sites that I have bookmarked. Without a definition, it is meaningless.
Akane's memory sure has dropped into the toilet, especially for someone who's not even forty years old. This also smacks of Idiot Plot Device.
No, Akane's memory hasn't "dropped into the toilet", but it has been 22 years. I'm 43 years old and I don't recall things that I did when I was 21 years old precisely and neither does anyone else - or Akane. It is easy to think that memory is a solid thing, but it is very fluid. Expecting Akane to remember anything that happened 22 years ago with clarity would be unreasonable.
Tofu is his first name, NOT his family name.
Right, it's Ono. Got used to using Dr. Tofu from reading the manga and other sources. Should I tweak this or let it stand?
OUCH. Holy shit was this ever callous. Especially since it's none of his business.. Frankly, Kasumi would have been well within her rights never to speak to her father again after a comment like that.
Yes, they are manipulative bastards, aren't they? Genma will be even more so.
The entire conversation up to this reeks so strongly of Idiot Plot Device that it practically bowled me over even though I saw it coming virtually from the start. This also ranks as a first-class piece of Ham-Fisted Melodrama, to a degree that is hard to believe.
There's that term again - that doesn't mean anything as far as I can find. Ham-fisted Melodrama? How? And more importantly what to you suggest I do to fix it? While you flow your comments freely, nuclear death frog, you offer nothing to help me to improve this.
Especially since this "doctor" hardly even knows Ranma; he's operating on at best second-hand information, some of it flawed.
It was mentioned that Ranma had been back for about two months. Seeing a doctor like this (especially when first starting out) is usually a two or three times a week affair (if not more, if the doctor thinks it is necessary) which means that the doctor has had approximately twelve to eighteen (if not more) sessions with Ranma - more than enough to formulate a professional opinion. Should I detail that fact somewhere in the chapter or let it go?
Frankly, it was handled so poorly that I really don't think I can continue reading this. Sorry.
That is your prerogative, but let me point out that the reason that I posted this here instead of FFnet or in my 'publicly accessible areas' of my web site is to get critical reviews of this. This means that I'm looking for reviews that point out the weaknesses of the chapter, why the area is weak, and offer directions or solutions to correct the flaws.
You pointed out what you felt were weak areas of the chapter, but didn't really detail why you thought it was weak beyond the term "Idiot Plot Device" (which now I can't find a clear
definition of outside of vague
samples in movies) or some such, and instead of offering something constructive to aid me in improving this - you offered nothing.
Big help that was - and I expected better from you especially after the assistance you have given me in the past. In the future, please concentrate on helping me out by following the above steps, not doing something like this - this was basically worthless.
DCG wrote:This is a boring emo Ranma, that I just don't understand.
I don't see ranma reacting like that in any way.
Hmmm... Most my other pre-readers (the ones that read this before I posted it here) thought that Ranma reacting emotional was understandable given the circumstances that he has found himself in. If you think it was overdone or not well done, could you give me any thoughts or suggestions on tweaking it?
I'm trying to avoid the "Ranma wakes up one morning and is fine with everything and goes on with his life like nothing ever happened" syndrome that I see too much of. Most of my other pre-readers thought that this was a good approach and that thought I pulled off well and that Ranma was behaving in a believable way given what has happened.
If you disagree, I can accept that - but how do you think Ranma should be acting? I'm open to suggestions.
Every one else is screwed up to, but that could easly be part of the fic if Ranma was on the ball.
Having screwed up characters is part of the fun... Hmmm... are you also saying that there wasn't enough interaction with Ranma and these characters? Could you give me examples of what I overlooked and give me some suggestions?
Only one worth reading about right now is Nodoka.
Are you saying I didn't develop anyone else's character enough to make them interesting or just that Nodoka's character was the one that stood out the most?
-----
To those who read this and thought it was fine and dropped me a line to tell me so: Thank you, I do appreciate it.
To those of you that didn't like this chapter or found problems with it, I need to hear from you specifically - but only if you have something helpful to offer. As I stated above, I posted this here to get critical reviews of this.
This means that I'm looking for reviews that point out the weaknesses of the chapter, why the area is weak, and offer directions or solutions to correct the weaknesses.One of the reasons I sat on this so long was because of several degrees of uncertainty I had with this chapter. I posted it here hoping to get additional help and input. This was a horribly complex chapter and I need feedback with more "meat" on it. If something is not working, POINT it out. Then TELL me WHY it isn't working and then OFFER SUGGESTIONS to HELP me make it BETTER. If something is not working and you are uncertain as to what, point it out anyway and say you're not sure. I can deal with that as well.
Also please keep insult or insult-like terms to yourself, they offer nothing and I'm too old to put up with that kind of crap. If something is not working, say "This isn't working" and go on from there. Using undefined and insulting-like terms will just undermine anything constructive that may be said afterward.
As far as how much I willing to go with this chapter, I'm not above a rewrite - if I think it is warranted. However, I think most of the major pieces are in place and it is a matter of refinement. If you think otherwise, then say so constructively.
If your comments are long and drawn out or you don't feel comfortable posting any feedback here, then email me. All I ask that you keep it polite and constructive. My email address is:
Trimatter1@austin.rr.comTo everyone who took the time, thanks.
- Trimatter